Kant and the duty to promote one’s own happiness

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65 (3):327-338 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his discussion of the duty of benevolence in §27 of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant argues that agents have no obligation to promote their own happiness, for ‘this happens unavoidably’ (MS, AA 6:451). In this paper I argue that Kant should not have said this. I argue that Kant should have conceded that agents do have an obligation to promote their own happiness.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-03

Downloads
2,349 (#5,774)

6 months
391 (#5,716)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samuel J. M. Kahn
Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Citations of this work

Why we go wrong: beyond Kant’s dichotomy between duty and self-love.Martin Sticker & Joe Saunders - 2025 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 68 (2):794-825.
On the Philosophical Incoherence of a Duty to Promote the Highest Good.Samuel Kahn - 2024 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 41 (2):165-183.
Sex, Consent, and Moral Obligations.Konstantin Morozov - 2023 - Problems of Ethics 12:27-47.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Practical philosophy.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mary J. Gregor.
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - In Mary J. Gregor, Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37-108.
Servility and self-respect.Thomas E. Hill - 1973 - The Monist 57 (1):87 - 104.
`Ought' conversationally implies `can'.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1984 - Philosophical Review 93 (2):249-261.

View all 10 references / Add more references