Matching versus maximizing: Comments on Prelec's paper

, &
Psychological Review 90 (4):380-384 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.380

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How to decide between matching and maximizing: A reply to Prelec.Howard Rachlin - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):376-379.
Matching, maximizing, and the hyperbolic reinforcement feedback function.Dražen Prelec - 1982 - Psychological Review 89 (3):189-230.
The empirical claims of maximization theory: A reply to Rachlin and to Kagel, Battalio, and Green.Dražen Prelec - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):385-389.
Matching and maximizing in concurrent schedules.Gene M. Heyman - 1979 - Psychological Review 86 (5):496-500.
On matching and maximizing in operant choice experiments.J. E. Staddon & Susan Motheral - 1978 - Psychological Review 85 (5):436-444.
"On Matching and Maximizing in Operant Choice Experiments": Correction.J. E. R. Staddon & Susan Motheral - 1979 - Psychological Review 86 (2):156-156.
Response independence, matching and maximizing: A reply to Heyman.J. E. Staddon & Susan Motheral - 1979 - Psychological Review 86 (5):501-505.
Matching versus optimal data selection in the Wason selection task.Hiroshi Yama - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (3):295 – 311.
Protesting too much: Self-deception and self-signaling.Ryan McKay, Danica Mijovi??-Prelec, Dra?? en Prelec, William von Hippel & Robert Trivers - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):34.
Introducing a Method for Calculating the Allocation of Attention in a Cognitive “Two-Armed Bandit” Procedure: Probability Matching Gives Way to Maximizing.Gene M. Heyman, Katherine A. Grisanzio & Victor Liang - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Economic Choice Theory: An Experimental Analysis of Animal Behavior, John H. Kagel, Raymond C. Battalio, and Leonard Green. Cambridge University Press, 1995, xii + 230 pages. [REVIEW]Paul Weirich - 1999 - Economics and Philosophy 15 (2):295.
Measures of Assortativity.Theodore C. Bergstrom - 2013 - Biological Theory 8 (2):133-141.
On the existence of fair matching algorithms.F. Masarani & S. S. Gokturk - 1989 - Theory and Decision 26 (3):305-322.
Reply to Comments on Could Gambling Save Science?Robin Hanson - unknown
Equitable Selection in Bilateral Matching Markets.Antonio Romero-Medina - 2005 - Theory and Decision 58 (3):305-324.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
20 (#749,846)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Kagel
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references