Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):421 - 437 (2010)

Adam Kadlac
Wake Forest University
This paper explores the debate between personists, who argue that the concept of a person if of central importance for moral thought, and personists, who argue that the concept of a human being is of greater moral significance. On the one hand, it argues that normative naturalism, the most ambitious defense of the humanist position, fails to identify moral standards with standards of human behavior and thereby fails to undermine the moral significance of personhood. At the same time, it contends that a more focused attention on the morally relevant features of human life may indeed play a crucial role in enhancing our moral understanding
Keywords Personhood  Moral theory  Humanism  Personism  Moral status
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-009-9214-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
On Virtue Ethics.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Neo-Aristotelian Naturalism and the Indeterminacy Objection.Scott Woodcock - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (1):20-41.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
101 ( #117,419 of 2,520,398 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #137,518 of 2,520,398 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes