Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard–easy effect

Psychological Review 107 (2):384-396 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The nature and meaning of dogmatism.Milton Rokeach - 1954 - Psychological Review 61 (3):194-204.
A Critical Examination of the Radical Empiricism of William James.Robert M. Kunz - 1953 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
13 (#1,066,279)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method in Epistemology.Jennifer Nagel - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (3):495-527.
Being Rational and Being Wrong.Kevin Dorst - 2023 - Philosophers' Imprint 23 (1).
On the Supposed Evidence for Libertarian Paternalism.Gerd Gigerenzer - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3):361-383.
The trouble with overconfidence.Don A. Moore & Paul J. Healy - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (2):502-517.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references