A Study to Examine the Process of Ethics Case Consultation in End-of-Life Decisions

Dissertation, Boston College (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the process used by ethics consultants to resolve conflicts in end-of-life decisions. The study utilized a descriptive correlational retrospective survey design to investigate the process of ethics case consultation. A survey questionnaire, developed for this study, identified 58 process items derived from the literature on ethics case consultation and mediation. Using a four-point Likert scale, respondents indicated the frequency of occurrence of the process items based on their experience. The non-random sample of 289 respondents were members of the Society for Bioethics Consultation . ;Data analysis was based on a response rate of 74%. Demographic results were consistent with SBC membership. The content validity and internal consistency reliability of the survey questionnaire were supported in the factor analysis of the 58 process items, which yielded six factors with eigenvalues of 2.0 or greater and accounted for 48.5% of the variance. The individual alpha reliability scores for these six factors ranged from.92 to.68. ;Further analysis indicated that ethics consultants use a consistent and identifiable consultation process that has three phases: Intake, Discussion, and Follow-Up. In the Intake phase, information is gathered from the parties involved in the case. The Discussion phase reflects a facilitated, mediation-oriented discussion that is fact-based, inclusive, patient-centered, and morally reflective. Conclusions in the discussion are non-binding recommendations reached by consensus. The Follow-Up phase of consultation includes contact with many of the parties involved and assessment of the consultation by them. ;Due to the limitations of the study, one cannot generalize that all ethics consultations adhere to the process identified in the study. The implications for nurses who provide ethics case consultation include the encouragement to promote their perspective of patient advocacy, their commitment to working with other professionals, and their strong training in interpersonal communication skills

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Invoking the Law in Ethics Consultation.Bethany Spielman - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (4):457.
Why Quality Is Addressed So Rarely in Clinical Ethics Consultation.George J. Agich - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (4):339.
Patient Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):1 - 9.
Why doctors use or do not use ethics consultation.J. P. Orlowski - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):499-503.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-01

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references