Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology by Michael Ruse [Book Review]

Isis 89:149-150 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/383967

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Essay Review: Progress and Its Problems. [REVIEW]Joe Cain - 1999 - Journal of the History of Biology 32 (1):197-204.
Review of Michael Ruse: Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. [REVIEW]Ron Amundson - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):515-521.
Michael Ruse's Design for Living.Robert J. Richards - 2004 - Journal of the History of Biology 37 (1):25 - 38.
Evolutionary biology and teleological thinking.Michael Ruse - 2002 - In Andre Ariew, Robert Cummins & Mark Perlman (eds.), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford University Press. pp. 33--60.
Epistemology, necessity, and evolution: a critical review of Michael Ruse’s Philosophy After Darwin. [REVIEW]Carlos Mariscal - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):449-457.
Michael Ruse and his fifteen years of booknotes – for better or for worse.David L. Hull - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (3):423-435.
Metaphor in evolutionary biology.Michael Ruse - 2000 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 54 (214):593-619.
Evolution and the idea of social progress.Michael Ruse - 2010 - In Denis R. Alexander & Ronald L. Numbers (eds.), Biology and Ideology From Descartes to Dawkins. University of Chicago Press.
Really taking Darwin seriously: An alternative to Michael Ruse's Darwinian metaethics. [REVIEW]William A. Rottschaefer & David Martinsen - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (2):149-173.
Karl Popper's philosophy of biology.Michael Ruse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):638-661.
Evolutionary Biology and Cultural Values: Is It Irremediably Corrupt?Michael Ruse - 1994 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 20 (sup1):43-68.
Moral Philosophy as Applied Science.Michael Ruse & Edward O. Wilson - 1994 - In E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. The Mit Press. Bradford Books. pp. 61--421.
Moral commitment without objectivity or illusion: Comments on Ruse and Woolcock.Bruce N. Waller - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):245-254.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
20 (#723,940)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references