A note on equational theories

Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (4):1705-1712 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Several attempts have been done to distinguish “positive” information in an arbitrary first order theory, i.e., to find a well behaved class of closed sets among the definable sets. In many cases, a definable set is said to be closed if its conjugates are sufficiently distinct from each other. Each such definition yields a class of theories, namely those where all definable sets are constructible, i.e., boolean combinations of closed sets. Here are some examples, ordered by strength:Weak normality describes a rather small class of theories which are well understood by now (see, for example, [P]). On the other hand, normalization is so weak that all theories, in a suitable context, are normalizable (see [HH]). Thus equational theories form an interesting intermediate class of theories. Little work has been done so far. The original work of Srour [S1, S2, S3] adopts a point of view that is closer to universal algebra than to stability theory. The fundamental definitions and model theoretic properties can be found in [PS], though some easy observations are missing there. Hrushovski's example of a stable non-equational theory, the first and only one so far, is described in the unfortunately unpublished manuscript [HS]. In fact, it is an expansion of the free pseudospace constructed independently by Baudisch and Pillay in [BP] as an example of a strictly 2-ample theory. Strong equationality, defined in [Hr], is also investigated in [HS].

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#459,370)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Semi-Equational Theories.Artem Chernikov & Alex Mennen - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-32.
The indiscernible topology: A mock zariski topology.Markus Junker & Daniel Lascar - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (01):99-124.
Schlanke Körper (Slim fields).Markus Junker & Jochen Koenigsmann - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (2):481-500.
Comparing axiomatizations of free pseudospaces.Olaf Beyersdorff - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (7):625-641.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A new strongly minimal set.Ehud Hrushovski - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 62 (2):147-166.
Fundamentals of forking.Victor Harnik & Leo Harrington - 1984 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 26 (3):245-286.

Add more references