Stochastic evolutionary dynamics: Drift versus draft

Philosophy of Science 73 (5):655-665 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a small handful of papers in theoretical population genetics, John Gillespie (2000a, 2000b, 2001) argues that a new stochastic process he calls "genetic draft" is evolutionarily more significant than genetic drift. This case study of chance in evolution explores Gillespie's proposed stochastic evolutionary force and sketches the implications of Gillespie's argument for philosophers' explorations of genetic drift.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Random drift and the omniscient viewpoint.Roberta L. Millstein - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):S10-S18.
Chance and natural selection.John Beatty - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):183-211.
An explication of the causal dimension of drift.Peter Gildenhuys - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):521-555.
Can there be stochastic evolutionary causes?Patrick Forber & Kenneth Reisman - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):616-627.
Population genetics.Roberta L. Millstein & Robert A. Skipper - 2006 - In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
125 (#141,621)

6 months
12 (#200,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Robert Skipper
St. Mary's University, Texas
Robert Skipper
University of Cincinnati