'Ought' and Institutional Obligation

Philosophy 46 (178):309 - 323 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An obligation may take either of two forms, each form being reported in a different way. For example, when we report the obligation of parents to care for their children, if it is the moral obligation we mean, we will say ‘Parents ought to look after their children’ but if we mean the legal obligation, we will say ‘Parents have to look after their children’. The law specifies that people shall do thus and so, not that they ought to do thus and so

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Parental Obligation.Nellie Wieland - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (3):249-267.
The Possibility of an Agreed Ethics.A. C. Ewing - 1946 - Philosophy 21 (78):29 - 41.
Law, Shared Activities, and Obligation.Stefano Bertea - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 27 (2):357-381.
Manuscript on Morals.H. A. Prichard - 2002 - In H. A. Prichard (ed.), Moral writings. New York: Oxford University Press.
Parental Love and Filial Equality.Giacomo Floris & Riccardo Spotorno - forthcoming - Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-15.
What Do Prospective Parents Owe to Their Children?Abigail Levin - 2024 - Hastings Center Report 54 (2):34-43.
Moral Obligation.H. A. Prichard - 2002 - In H. A. Prichard (ed.), Moral writings. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
36 (#493,342)

6 months
19 (#209,480)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references