Philosophical Explorations 20 (1):70-87 (2017)

Authors
Hrishikesh Joshi
Bowling Green State University
Abstract
This paper explores some key commitments of the idea that it can be rational to do what you believe you ought not to do. I suggest that there is a prima facie tension between this idea and certain plausible coherence constraints on rational agency. I propose a way to resolve this tension. While akratic agents are always irrational, they are not always practically irrational, as many authors assume. Rather, “inverse” akratics like Huck Finn fail in a distinctively theoretical way. What explains why akratic agents are always either theoretically or practically irrational? I suggest that this is true because an agent’s total evidence determines both the beliefs and the intentions it is rational for her to have. Moreover, an agent’s evidence does so in a way such that it is never rational for the agent to at once believe that she ought to Φ and lack the intention to Φ.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/13869795.2016.1246669
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On What Matters: Two-Volume Set.Derek Parfit - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Nicomachean Ethics.H. Aristotle & Rackham - 1968 - Harvard University Press.
Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Huck Finn, Moral Reasons and Sympathy.Craig Taylor - 2012 - Philosophy 87 (4):583-593.
Huck Finn and Moral Argument.John Fennel - 2002 - Teaching Philosophy 25 (3):227-236.
Reclaiming the Conscience of Huckleberry Finn.Clea F. Rees - 2006 - In Daniel Kolak & Raymond Martin (eds.), The Experience of Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Huck Finn, Moral Language and Moral Education.Anders Schinkel - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):511-525.
Epistemic Akrasia.Sophie Horowitz - 2014 - Noûs 48 (4):718-744.
Huck Finn the Inverse Akratic: Empathy and Justice.Chad Kleist - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (3):257-266.
Praise, Blame and the Whole Self.Nomy Arpaly & Timothy Schroeder - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 93 (2):161-188.
Marking Twain.Dan Bustillos & Brad Thornock - 2013 - Journal of Medical Humanities 34 (4):455-458.
Rational Akrasia.John Brunero - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (4):546-566.
Ideal Rationality and Hand Waving.Reed Richter - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (2):147 – 156.
Rational Resolve.Richard Holton - 2004 - Philosophical Review 113 (4):507-535.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-10-28

Total views
42 ( #271,975 of 2,519,681 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,681 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes