Multi-criteria Evaluation in Strategic Environmental Assessment in the Creation of a Sustainable Agricultural Waste Management Plan for wineries: Case Study: Oplenac Vineyard

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (1):1-27 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Strategic Environmental Assessment, as a support to strategic planning, is a starting point in the creation of a sustainable concept of managing waste that is based on the principles of a circular economy. The role of SEA is to guide the planning process towards the goal of securing the best effects in relation to the quality of the living environment and the socio-economic aspects of development. SEA is also an instrument that can be used when making optimal decisions about spatial development, which further contributes to its importance and role in the planning process. The implementation of SEA allows developers to establish the benefits and implications of the proposed spatial changes, taking into account the capacity of the space to sustain the planned development, and to determine the degree of acceptability of the proposed spatial changes. This paper presents a specific method used for impact assessment in SEA for the Agro-Waste Management Plan for Oplenac Vineyard. The specificity of this method is that it combines specific goals, indicators and criteria for assessing the effect of planning solutions formulated in the simulated AWMP for Oplenac Vineyard using a semi-quantitative expert method. The results of the paper indicate the possibility of using GIS tools to increase objectivity in the expert evaluation of planning solutions, particularly in relation to a group of criteria for assessing the spatial dispersion of the impacts. This reduces the subjectivity that is characteristic of all expert methods. The graphical presentation of the results in GIS technology and the use of matrices and graphs to present the results makes them easier to understand and creates a good basis for making optimal decisions on future activities concerning the elimination of waste from wineries and viticulture. The research was carried out within the framework of the NoAW project, which is supported by the European Commission through the Horizon2020 research and innovation program.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Environmental and social implications of waste in U.s. Agriculture and food sectors.David Pimentel - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (1):5-20.
Strategic and Operational Planning As Approach for Crises Management Field Study on UNRWA.Mazen J. Al Shobaki, Youssef M. Abu Amuna & Samy S. Abu Naser - 2017 - International Journal of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering 5 (6):43-47.
A case study concerning the strategic plan: V2020 of.Kiyoung Kim - 2013 - Science Journal of Business and Management 1 (4):43-57.
Can We Plan Science?: (Semantics and Pitfalls.Michael J. Moravcsik - 1984 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 4 (4):361-378.
Generation and Management of Electronic Waste in the City of Pune, India.Anwesha Borthakur - 2014 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 34 (1-2):43-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-24

Downloads
9 (#1,258,729)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Environmental ethics: An overview.J. Baird Callicott - forthcoming - Encyclopedia of Bioethics.
Moral responsibility for environmental problems—individual or institutional?Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (2):109-124.
How Ecology Can Edify Ethics: The Scope of Morality.Lantz Fleming Miller - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (4):443-454.
Environmental Ethics in Poland.Dominika Dzwonkowska - 2017 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (1):135-151.

Add more references