Thought as word dynamics

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):295-295 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A Hebbian model for speech generation opens a number of paths. A cross-linguistic scheme of functional relationships (inspired by Aristotle) dispenses with distraction by the “parts of speech” distinctions, while bridging the gap between “content” and “structure” words. A gradient model identifies emotional and rational dynamics and shows speech generation as a process where a speaker's dissatisfaction gets minimized.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Role of Dynamics in Stakeholder Thinking.Duane Windsor - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):79-87.
Recognition of continuous speech requires top-down processing.Kenneth N. Stevens - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):348-348.
Dialogue coherence: A generation framework. [REVIEW]Robbert-Jan Beun & Rogier M. van Eijk - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):365-385.
Lexical biases are useful.José R. Benkí - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):326-327.
The elementary units of meaning.Paul J. M. Jorion - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):483-484.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#459,882)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references