Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-17 (forthcoming)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
Law-enforcement agencies are increasingly able to leverage crime statistics to make risk predictions for particular individuals, employing a form of inference some condemn as violating the right to be "treated as an individual". I suggest that the right encodes agents' entitlement to fair distribution of the burdens and benefits of the rule of law. Rather than precluding statistical prediction, it requires that citizens be able to anticipate which variables will be used as predictors, and act intentionally to avoid them. Furthermore, it condemns reliance on various indexes of distributive injustice, or unchosen properties, as evidence of law-breaking.
|
| Keywords | algorithms data ethics predictive policing rule of law statistical evidence ai right to be treated as an individual profiling |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1017/can.2021.28 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
The Rational Impermissibility of Accepting (Some) Racial Generalizations.Renée Jorgensen Bolinger - 2020 - Synthese 197 (6):2415-2431.
View all 23 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Algorithms and the Individual in Criminal Law – Corrigendum.Renée Jorgensen - forthcoming - Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
Similar books and articles
Algorithmic Paranoia: The Temporal Governmentality of Predictive Policing.Bonnie Sheehey - 2019 - Ethics and Information Technology 21 (1):49-58.
Developing Transparency Requirements for the Operation of Criminal Justice Algorithms in New Zealand.Briony Blackmore - unknown
Algorithms and Autonomy: The Ethics of Automated Decision Systems.Alan Rubel, Clinton Castro & Adam Pham - 2021 - Cambridge University Press.
Algorithms in Practice: Comparing Web Journalism and Criminal Justice.Angèle Christin - 2017 - Big Data and Society 4 (2).
The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.Brent Mittelstadt, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter & Luciano Floridi - 2016 - Big Data and Society 3 (2).
Isomorphism Through Algorithms: Institutional Dependencies in the Case of Facebook.Danah Boyd & Robyn Caplan - 2018 - Big Data and Society 5 (1).
How Experimental Algorithmics Can Benefit From Mayo’s Extensions to Neyman–Pearson Theory of Testing.Thomas Bartz-Beielstein - 2008 - Synthese 163 (3):385-396.
Mass Personalization: Predictive Marketing Algorithms and the Reshaping of Consumer Knowledge.Baptiste Kotras - 2020 - Big Data and Society 7 (2).
Evidence, Explanation and Predictive Data Modelling.Steve Mckinlay - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (4):461-473.
How Experimental Algorithmics Can Benefit From Mayo’s Extensions to Neyman–Pearson Theory of Testing.Thomas Bartz-Beielstein - 2008 - Synthese 163 (3):385 - 396.
Results of Testing, Research and Analysis of the Basic Clustering Algorithms of Numerical Data Sets.Trokhymchuk R. M. - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence Scientific Journal 24 (1-2):101-107.
How to Make Decisions with Algorithms.Anders Persson & Iordanis Kavathatzopoulos - 2018 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 47 (4):122-133.
Privacy rights and ‘naked’ statistical evidence.Lauritz Aastrup Munch - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (11):3777-3795.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-09-16
Total views
150 ( #76,735 of 2,497,816 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
89 ( #8,160 of 2,497,816 )
2021-09-16
Total views
150 ( #76,735 of 2,497,816 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
89 ( #8,160 of 2,497,816 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
