How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud: View from a Different Culture

&
Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1659-1660 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-017-9947-6

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Science as a Matter of Honour: How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud in Japan.Pablo A. Pellegrini - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1297-1313.
On fraud.Liam Kofi Bright - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (2):291-310.
Stealing Into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing.Marcel C. LaFollette - 1996 - Univ of California Press.
Data selection and responsible conduct: Was Millikan a fraud? [REVIEW]Richard C. Jennings - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):639-653.
Definition of Research Misconduct: Problem on “Definition” or “User”? [REVIEW]Somsri Wiwanitkit & Viroj Wiwanitkit - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):615-615.
Responses of Authors Accused of Plagiarism by Journal Editors.Somsri Wiwanitkit & Viroj Wiwanitkit - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1):309-311.
Zika virus infection and Wolbachia (comment on DOI: 10.1002/bies.201600175).Beuy Joob & Viroj Wiwanitkit - 2017 - Bioessays 39 (4):1600267.
Fraud in science.Robert L. Park - 2008 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 75 (4):1135-1150.
Impure Science: Fraud, Compromise, and Political Influence in Scientific Research by Robert Bell; Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing by Marcel C. LaFollette.Nicholas Steneck - 1993 - Isis 84:833-834.
Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?R. Grant Steen - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (4):249-253.
The fallout: What happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?James S. Lubalin & Jennifer L. Matheson - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):229-250.
Is Scientific Realism an Empirical Hypothesis?Jaap Brakel Igor Douven - 1995 - Dialectica 49 (1):3-14.
How to judge scientific research articles.Hennie Lotter - 2000 - South African Journal for Language Teaching 34.
Going Public: Good Scientific Conduct.Gitte Meyer & Peter Sandøe - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):173-197.
Scientific Integrity in Brazil.Liliane Lins & Fernando Martins Carvalho - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (3):283-287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-21

Downloads
23 (#664,515)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references