Matthew Jones
University of Greenwich
Richard Rorty’s liberal utopia offers an interesting model for those who wish to explore the emancipatory potential of a post-foundational account of politics, specifically liberalism. What Rorty proposes is a form of liberalism that is divorced from its Kantian metaphysical foundations. This paper will focus on the gulf that appears between Rorty’s liberal utopia in theory, the political form that it must ultimately manifest itself in, and the consequences this has for debates on pluralism, diversity, and identity, within liberal political thought. The strength of Rorty’s liberal utopia, in his analysis, lies in the fact that with the rejection of philosophy and metaphysics, we can simply get on with the job of reducing cruelty through experimental tinkering with the liberal political system. Instead of trying to develop intellectually sophisticated justifications for why we act, we should just act. Political action, for Rorty, does not require a philosophical or metaphysical justification. However, upon closer critical examination, we can see that whatever potential Rorty’s liberal utopia may have in theory, this is negated by the fact that at the level of political praxis, his re-description of liberalism leaves us with a conception of liberalism that is essentially unchanged. Whilst Rorty has re-situated liberalism from the philosophical to the political, his solution fails to address any internal problems.
Keywords Richard Rorty  liberalism  public/private distinction
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - The Personalist Forum 5 (2):149-152.
Feminism and Pragmatism.Richard Rorty - 2010 - In Marianne Janack (ed.), Radical Philosophy. Pennsylvania State University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Richard Rorty’s Ironic Liberalism: A Critical Analysis.Michele Marsonet - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:391-403.
Liberalism, Ethnocentrism, and Solidarity: Reflections on Rorty.David Rondel - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:55-68.
Problems with Rorty’s Pragmatist Defense of Liberalism.Paul D. Forster - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:345-362.
Liberal Universalism: On Brian Barry and Richard Rorty.Michael Bacon - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (2):41-62.
'Hold the Being': How to Split Rorty Between Irony and Finitude.Rudi Visker - 1999 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (2):27-45.
Richard Rorty and the Problem of Cruelty.Rachel Haliburton - 1997 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1):49-69.
Rorty's Liberal Utopia and Huxley's Island.William M. Curtis - 2011 - Philosophy and Literature 35 (1):91-103.


Added to PP index

Total views
472 ( #19,532 of 2,506,112 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #10,941 of 2,506,112 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes