Policy legitimation, expert advice, and objectivity: 'Opening' the UK governance framework for human genetics

Social Epistemology 18 (2 & 3):247 – 270 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In response to political pressures arising from controversial science policy decisions, the United Kingdom (UK) government conducted a review of its biotechnology governance framework in 1999, identifying best practices of open government and creating strategic bodies to adopt them. Drawing from empirical data on the context and nature of the open government framework, this paper argues that the framework may be interpreted as elasticizing objectivity. Value-neutral scientific objectivity is essentially 'stretched' into a pluralist objectivity that purports to represent a spectrum of interests without privileging any, allowing the policy culture to retain its legitimating objectivity and authority. Governance implications of this analysis are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theorising the Governance of Education.Charles D. Raab - 1994 - British Journal of Educational Studies 42 (1):6 - 22.
Scientific objectivity and the logics of science.H. E. Longino - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):85 – 106.
The scope and limits of scientific objectivity.Joseph F. Hanna - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (3):339-361.
Can scientists be objective?Malcolm Williams - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (2):163 – 180.
Objectivity in Logic and Nature.Richard Dien Winfield - 2002 - The Owl of Minerva 34 (1):77-89.
Objectivity.Lorraine Daston - 2007 - Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. Edited by Peter Galison.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
17 (#742,076)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?