Framework for Understanding Fair Trade Disintermediation

Business and Society Review 117 (4):443-475 (2012)

Abstract

Our research seeks to answer the question of how a conventional commodity supply chain can be transformed into a disintermediated commodity supply chain in the context of the fair trade movement. We present a normative framework for conceptualizing the disintermediation process, exploring the variables bearing on this process using the case of FT coffee to illustrate our insights. We highlight the motivational sources driving FT, suggesting that it is increasingly to the advantage of multinational enterprises to leverage their market power to circumvent intermediaries in the supply chain and, in so doing, shift a greater share of income and wealth to producing communities. A research agenda centered on building an FT supply‐chain disintermediation index is proposed

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
4 (#1,288,094)

6 months
1 (#386,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Framework for Understanding Fair Trade Disintermediation.Jonathan Doh & Kenneth Taylor - 2012 - Business and Society Review 117 (4):443-475.
Fair Trade: Towards an Economics of Virtue. [REVIEW]Alex Nicholls - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 92 (2):241 - 255.
The University and the Moral Imperative of Fair Trade Coffee.Gavin Fridell - 2004 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (1):141-159.
Fair Trade in Mexico and Abroad: An Alternative to the Walmartopia?Jesús Alvarado - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (S2):301 - 317.
Green Light for Greener Supply.Lutz Preuss - 2002 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 11 (4):308–317.