Disease Genes Are Not Patentable: A Rebuttal of McGee

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):425-428 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dr. McGee presents a cogent argument for the patentability of the diagnosis of gene forms that are found to be associated with disease or other phenotypic manifestations. We're convinced he's wrong. An analogy will help explain why

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genetic disease, genetic testing and the clinician.Kelly C. Smith - 2001 - Journal of the American Medical Association 285 (1):91.
What is a Gene? From molecules to metaphysics.Holmes Rolston - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):471-497.
Transparent Women, Visible Genes, and New Conceptions of Disease.Ruth Hubbard - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (3):291.
The burden of dementia: A medical and research perspective.Piero Antuono & Jan Beyer - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):3-13.
The concept of disease: Structure and change.Paul Thagard - 1996 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 29 (3/4):445-478.
Fuzzy health, illness, and disease.Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (5):605 – 638.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
46 (#337,879)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references