Analyzability, ad hoc restrictions, and excessive flexibility of evidence-accumulation models: Reply to two critical commentaries

Psychological Review 121 (4):689-695 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In reply [reply to commentaries on "how to solve the mind-body problem"].Nicholas Humphrey - 2000 - Humphrey, Nicholas (2000) in Reply [Reply to Commentaries on "How to Solve the Mind-Body Problem"]. [Journal (Paginated)] 7 (4):98-112.
Truth in Evidence and Truth in Arguments without Logical Omniscience.Gregor Betz - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4):1117-1137.
Standard quantification theory in the analysis of English.Stephen Donaho - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (6):499-526.
Anomalies Persist, So Does the Problem of Harm.Philip Thomas, Pat Bracken & Sami Timimi - 2012 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 19 (4):317-321.
On accumulation of information and model selection.Ido Erev - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):406-407.
Models, Representation, and Mediation.Tarja Knuuttila - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1260-1271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
5 (#1,510,250)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matt Jones
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references