Wohlrapp on the Criterial Side of Validity: Some Comments

Informal Logic 37 (3):223-229 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Harald Wohlrapp’s The Concept of Argument has made a significant contribution to the argumentation theory by proposing a new approach to our way of thinking about arguments and argumentation that in which he proposes a criterion of criterial validity: An thesis is valid, if there are no open objections against the justification offered for it. In this paper, I will focus on some issues and difficulties with that principle.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wohlrapp's concept of justification.Derek Allen - 2017 - Informal Logic 37 (3):170-182.
Editors' Introduction.The Editors - 2017 - Informal Logic 37 (3):161-161.
From the Editors.Christopher W. Tindale & J. Anthony Blair - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (2):246-246.
From the Editors.Christopher W. Tindale & J. Anthony Blair - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (1):246.
Issues of Logicism and Objectivity.Trudy Govier - 2017 - Informal Logic 37 (3):211-222.
Transsubjectivity.David Hitchcock - 2017 - Informal Logic 37 (3):230-239.
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Harald Wohlrapp & John Woods - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):285-290.
Criterial problems in creative cognition research.Melvin Chen - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (3):368-382.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-12

Downloads
10 (#1,129,009)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references