The Rejection of Infinite Postponement as a Philosophical Argument

Journal of Speculative Philosophy 10 (2):92 - 104 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Viciousness of Infinite Regresses.Claude Gratton - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:25-29.
Bonaventure on the Impossibility of a Beginningless World.Benjamin Brown - 2005 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (3):389-409.
Regress Argument Reconstruction.Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):489-503.
Argument-Forms which Turn Invalid over Infinite Domains: Physicalism as Supertask?Catherine Legg - 2008 - Contemporary Pragmatism 5 (1):1-11.
How many thoughts are there? Or why we likely have no Tegmark duplicates 10^10^115 m away.Douglas V. Porpora - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):133-149.
Craig on the actual infinite.Wes Morriston - 2002 - Religious Studies 38 (2):147-166.
Infinite Regress Arguments.Jan Willem Wieland - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (1):95-109.
Beginningless Past, Endless Future, and the Actual Infinite.Wes Morriston - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):439-450.
Closed systems, explanations, and the cosmological argument.Kevin Davey & Mark Lippelmann - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (2):89 - 101.
The Kalam Cosmological Argument and the Possibility of an Actually Infinite Future.Eric Sotnak - 1999 - Philo 2 (2):41-52.
No Postponement. [REVIEW]Gordon W. Allport - 1951 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 26 (3):471-472.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
28 (#556,922)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Infinite Regress Arguments.Jan Willem Wieland - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (1):95-109.
Who is Afraid of Epistemology’s Regress Problem?Scott F. Aikin - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (2):191-217.
Regress Argument Reconstruction.Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):489-503.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references