Abstract
The comparative method, closely identified with Darwinian evolutionary biology, also has a long pre-Darwinian history. The method derives its scientific power from its ability to interpret comparative observations with reference to a theory of relatedness among the entities being compared. Such scientifically powerful strong comparison is distinguished from weak comparison, which lacks such theoretical grounding. This paper examines the history of the strong comparison permitted by the comparative method from the early modern period to the threshold of the Darwinian revolution in the mid nineteenth century. It interprets the work of early pioneers such as Belon, Willis, Perrault, and Tyson from this methodological perspective, rather than focusing on their particular anatomical findings. Although these early writers made formative scientific contributions through their comparative investigations, the more theoretically grounded application of the comparative method by Geoffroy, Cuvier, and Owen was instrumental in laying the foundation for its later incorporation into Darwinian evolutionary theory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s40656-021-00474-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,577
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Darwinistická metaetika.Tomas Hribek - 2016 - In Jakub Jirsa (ed.), Přístupy k etice III. Praha, Česko: pp. 297-345.
Brief Remarks on the Evolutionary Method.Robert A. Phillips - 2004 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 4:235-238.
Brief Remarks on the Evolutionary Method.Robert A. Phillips - 2004 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2004:235-238.
Can Darwinian Inheritance Be Extended From Biology to Epistemology?Carla E. Kary - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:356 - 369.
Ethnographic Analogy, the Comparative Method, and Archaeological Special Pleading.Adrian Currie - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:84-94.
The Original Meaning of Thinking Way of Comparativism.Han-wen Fang - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):132-137.
The Triumph of the Darwinian Method.Frank N. Egerton - 1971 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2 (3):281-286.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-11-15

Total views
1 ( #1,558,356 of 2,533,580 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #390,861 of 2,533,580 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes