The network perspective will help, but is comorbidity the question?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):162-163 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Latent variable modeling has revealed important conundrums in the DSM classification system. We agree that the network perspective has potential to inspire new insights and resolve some of these conundrums. We note, however, that alone it cannot really help us understand etiology. Etiology, not comorbidity, is the fundamental question

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Extending the network perspective on comorbidity.Brian D. Haig & Frances M. Vertue - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):158-158.
Comorbidity as an epistemological challenge to modern psychiatry.Miro Jakovljević & Željka Crnčević - 2012 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 5 (1):1-13.
What's new here?Bruce Mangan - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):160-161.
ADHD, comorbidity, synaptic Gates and re-entrant circuits.Florence Levy - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):434-435.
Decentered Stakeholder Theory: Toward a Research Agenda.Dominic Kaeslin, Ruth Schmitt & Jerry Calton - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:448-452.
Psychiatric Comorbidity: More Than a Kuhnian Anomaly.Peter Zachar - 2009 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 16 (1):13-22.
On the question, “what is law?”.David Howarth - 2000 - Res Publica 6 (3):259-283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
18 (#785,610)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?