Teaching Literature as Aberrant Science

Diogenes 50 (2):55-64 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To be a teacher of literature at a university today is to occupy a problematic position in the production and codification of knowledge - a fact that has generated a great deal of critical comment in recent years. But this position in its problematic dimensions is not necessarily new. The teacher of literature has always been a propagator of an aberrant science - yet a science that in its aberrations has more to do with the methodological problems of the natural sciences than is usually credited. In this article the author approaches an initial statement of what makes the study of literature aberrant in this way, and in the process, elaborates upon a central dynamic of teaching literature that draws its strength from such scientific aberrance. In the process he moves towards a statement of the role played by an aberrant science in negotiating cultural identity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
23 (#664,515)

6 months
12 (#200,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia.Gilles Deleuze - 1987 - London: Athlone Press. Edited by Félix Guattari.
Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature.Erich Auerbach & Willard R. Trask - 1954 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 12 (4):526-527.
Hegel’s Development: Night Thoughts (Jena 1801–1806).H. S. Harris - 1983 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 25 (2):117-119.

View all 9 references / Add more references