Should Communitarians be Nationalists?

Journal of Applied Philosophy 11 (2):135-143 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT It is widely supposed by both its proponents and critics that communitarianism is committed to the defence of lies of nationhood: the nation forms a surviving communal attachment in a world in which the individual is otherwise denuded of ties of community. I argue in this paper that this assumption is mistaken. It depends on a romantic image of the nation which was constructed in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. That image hides the recent historical origins of the nation and its foundation in the suppression of older allegiances or their later privatisation; it continues to disguise the illusory nature of the national community. The nation is not a surviving pre‐modern community to which individuals are attached as a bulwark against the impersonality of public life in modern society. Rather the nation is one of the main vehicles for the construction of the modern unencumbered self. Communitarians need not be committed to the defence of the specifically modem forms of public irrationality and immorality that nationalism embodies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
20 (#747,345)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Should Nationalists be Communitarians?David Archard - 1996 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (2):215-220.
National identity, political trust and the public realm.Matthew Festenstein - 2009 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (2):279-296.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references