Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2):170-178 (2004)
AbstractIn a lively, interesting, and provocative paper Tuija Takala charges Julian Savulescu and me with bringing utilitarianism into disrepute and indeed with attempting to shoot it down, presumably in flames.1 Takala does not mince words. When she suggests that in our writings “utilitarianism is turning into the monster its critics always thought it was”, she is associating herself with those who charge us with propounding, again her words, the “inhumane theory that allows the sacrifice of minorities, the killing of the innocent, and simplistic calculations on the value of life”. Perhaps surprisingly for someone who identifies herself strongly with utilitarianism, Takala seems to take the worst and most ignorant critics of consequentialism generally, and of utilitarianism in particular, at face value and suggests that because their lazy, tendentious, and misdirected attacks on those they take to be utilitarians are often made against Savulescu and me that we somehow bear responsibility for this and for any charges they make, however ill judged or poorly supported by evidence
Similar books and articles
Utilitarianism Shot Down by Its Own Men?Tuija Takala - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (4):447-454.
Ethicalization in Bioscience—A Pilot Study in Finland.Matti Häyry, Jukka Takala, Piia Jallinoja, Salla Lötjönen & Tuija Takala - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (3):282-284.
The Morality of Naturalness.Tuija Takala - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):15-19.
Dissecting Bioethics.Matti Häyry & Tuija Takala - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):3-5.
Demagogues, Firefighters, and Window Dressers: Who Are We and What Should We Be?Tuija Takala - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (4):385-388.
What Is Wrong with Global Bioethics? On the Limitations of the Four Principles Approach.Tuija Takala - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (1):72-77.
Guest Editorial: Introduction to Philosophical Issues in Neuroethics.Tuija Takala - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2):161.
Autonomy, Respect, and Genetic Information Policy: A Reply to Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry.Rosamond Rhodes - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (1):114 – 120.
Bioethics and Social Reality – Edited by Matti Häyry, Tuija Takala and Peter Herrisone-Kelly.Paula Boddington - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (6):351–352.
Healthcare Ethics in Finland: A Follow-Up.Pekka Louhiala & Tuija Takala - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (3):236-240.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Respect for Persons in Bioethics: Towards a Human Rights-Based Account.Johan Brännmark - 2017 - Human Rights Review 18 (2):171-187.
Libertarianism, Legitimation, and the Problems of Regulating Cognition-Enhancing Drugs.Benjamin Capps - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (2):119-128.
Disability, Harm, and the Origins of Limited Opportunities.Simo Vehmas & Tom Shakespeare - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (1):41-47.
References found in this work
No references found.