Rejoinder to Machan and Tabarrok: Rand on Abortion, Revisited

&
Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):469 - 485 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gregory R. Johnson and David Rasmussen defend their critique of Ayn Rand's views on abortion, arguing that their critics miss its main points. Tibor Machan and Alexander Tabarrok actually depart from Rand's own position under the guise of defending it; they introduce a non-Randian distinction between being a human organism and being a moral person

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Johnson and Rasmussen: Rand the Moderate.Alexander Tabarrok - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):457 - 467.
Reply to Johnson and Rasmussen: Another Look at Abortion.Tibor R. Machan - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):449 - 456.
Rand on abortion: A critique.Gregory R. Johnson & David Rasmussen - 2000 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (2):245 - 261.
Reply to Douglas B. Rasmussen, "Rand on Obligation and Value" (Fall 2002) and Eric Mack, "Problematic Arguments in Randian Ethics" (Fall 2003): Rand and Choice. [REVIEW]Tibor R. Machan - 2006 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 7 (2):257 - 273.
A veteran reconnoiters Ayn Rand's philosophy. [REVIEW]Robert L. Campbell - 2000 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (2):293-312.
Rejoinder to Tibor R. Machan, "Rand and Choice" and Frank Bubb, "Did Ayn Rand Do the Shuffle?" (Spring 2006): More Problematic Arguments in Randian Ethics.Eric Mack - 2006 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 7 (2):287 - 307.
Liberty and nature: The missing link.Gregory R. Johnson - 1999 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (1):135 - 166.
Teaching Ayn Rand's Version of Ethical Egoism.Tibor R. Machan - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (1):71 - 81.
Rejoinder to Tibor R. Machan, "Rand and Choice" (Spring 2006): Regarding Choice and the Foundation of Morality: Reflections on Rand's Ethics.Douglas B. Rasmussen - 2006 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 7 (2):309 - 328.
Reply to Tibor R. Machan, "Rand and Choice" (Spring 2006), Eric Mack, "More Problematic Arguments in Randian Ethics" (Spring 2006), and Douglas B. Rasmussen, "Regarding Choice and the Foundation of Morality: Reflections on Rand's Ethics" (Spring 2006): Objectivity and the Proof of Egoism. [REVIEW]Robert Hartford - 2007 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (2):291 - 303.
Rejoinder to George Lyons and Tibor R. Machan: Free Will and Determinism.William Dwyer - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):221 - 230.
Egoism and benevolence. [REVIEW]Tibor R. Machan - 2000 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (2):283 - 291.
Rejoinder to Robert Hartford, "Objectivity and the Proof of Egoism" (Spring 2007): A Brief Comment on Hartford.Tibor R. Machan - 2007 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (2):305 - 306.
Reply to William Dwyer: Free Will Reconsidered.Tibor R. Machan - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):215 - 220.
Rand on Hume's Moral Skepticism.Tibor R. Machan - 2008 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 9 (2):245 - 251.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
42 (#370,986)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

When “A Is Not A”: Reflections on a Conversation.Kathleen Touchstone - 2017 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 17 (2):238-274.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references