Revisiting the Logical/Dialectical/Rhetorical Triumvirate

Abstract

Many argumentation theorists have adopted the view that argumentation may be approached from three different perspectives: the logical, the dialectical and the rhetorical—which I refer to as the Triumvirate.). According to Wenzel, the conceptual foundation for this Triumvirate is the distinction between argumentation as product, as process and as procedure. In this paper, I want to raise questions about the Triumvirate View and the Tripartite Distinction on which it is based.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Varro and Pompey.Raymond Astbury - 1967 - Classical Quarterly 17 (02):403-.
Defining Rhetorical Argumentation.Christian Kock - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):437-464.
Analogy argumentation in law: A dialectical perspective. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
24 (#639,942)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?