Mind 126 (503):964-967 (2017)

Authors
Johan E. Gustafsson
University of York
Abstract
© Mind Association 2017In a choice between saving five people or saving another person, is it better to save the five, other things being equal? According to utilitarianism, it would be better to save the five if the combined gain in well-being for them would be greater than the loss for the one. A standard objection is that adding up the gains or losses of different people in this manner is a problematic form of interpersonal aggregation. It is far from clear, however, what more precisely is supposed to be problematic about utilitarian aggregation. The aggregation critics—that is, among others, John Rawls, Robert Nozick, Thomas Nagel, John M. Taurek, and T. M. Scanlon—have not offered a clear criterion for what counts as a morally problematic form of aggregation and what does not. Hence it is hard to know what to make of this objection. In Moral Aggregation, Iwao...
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzw064
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,714
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Should the Numbers Count?John Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Utilitarianism Without Moral Aggregation.Johan E. Gustafsson - 2021 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):256-269.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Review Article: Aggregation and Non-Utilitarian Moral Theories.Iwao Hirose - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):273-284.
Aggregation and Numbers.Iwao Hirose - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (1):62-79.
Should We Select People Randomly?Iwao Hirose - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (1):45-46.
Why Be Formal?Iwao Hirose - 2008 - In David Leopold & Marc Stears (eds.), Political Theory: Methods and Approaches. Oxford University Press.
Egalitarianism.Iwao Hirose - 2014 - Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-05

Total views
71 ( #155,022 of 2,462,586 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,459 of 2,462,586 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes