Responsibility, Freedom and Determinism

Philosophy 13 (51):276 - 287 (1938)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There may in general be said to be two ways in which progress may be made in the understanding and towards the solution of a problem. The one is that of the continual development of it in the form originally given to it, by confirming this and rejecting that point in the light of fresh evidence, by clarification of concepts, and by detecting and resolving ambiguities and inconsistencies. Here it is assumed that the standpoint from which the problem has been approached is relevant and adequate. The other is entered upon when an “impasse” has been reached which can only be avoided by the realization that the original question was asked in a way which was either partially or wholly false or misleading. This is the more radical way of partial or total reformulation of the problem to be solved

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic freedom.J. David Velleman - 1989 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70 (1):73-97.
The Problem Of Freedom And Determinism.Edward D'Angelo - 1968 - Columbia: University Of Missouri Press.
The Problem of freedom.Mary T. Clark (ed.) - 1973 - New York,: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Freedom and determinism.Randolph Clarke - 1995 - Philosophical Books 36 (1):9-18.
Determinism, Randomness, and Value.Noa Latham - 2004 - Philosophical Topics 32 (1-2):153-167.
The psychology of freedom.Raymond Van Over - 1974 - Greenwich, Conn.: Fawcett Publications.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
29 (#538,668)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references