Morally, We Should Prefer to Exist: A Response to Smilansky

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (4):817-821 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent article [AJP, 2013], Saul Smilansky argues that our own existence is regrettable and that we should prefer not to have existed at all. I show why Smilansky's argument is fallacious, if we understand terms like ‘regrettable’ and ‘prefer’ in a straightforward non-deviant way

Similar books and articles

Morally, should we prefer never to have existed?Saul Smilansky - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):655-666.
Principled Divestiture Revisited.Jeremy Gwiazda - 2010 - Public Affairs Quarterly 24 (4):335-350.
Free Will and Illusion.Saul Smilansky - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A moral problem about prayer.Saul Smilansky - 2014 - Think 13 (36):105-113.
Pre-punishment, communicative theories of punishment, and compatibilism.Bill Wringe - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):125-136.
Team preferences.Robert Sugden - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):175-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-16

Downloads
281 (#69,553)

6 months
61 (#70,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sean Johnson
Victoria University of Wellington

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Foundations of Language 13 (1):145-151.
Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):341-344.
Counterfactuals. [REVIEW]William Parry - 1973 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (2):278-281.
Morally, should we prefer never to have existed?Saul Smilansky - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):655-666.

Add more references