Moral Legislation: A Legal-Political Model for Indirect Consequentialist Reasoning

New York: Cambridge University Press (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a book about moral reasoning: how we actually reason and how we ought to reason. It defends a form of 'rule' utilitarianism whereby we must sometimes judge and act in moral questions in accordance with generally accepted rules, so long as the existence of those rules is justified by the good they bring about. The author opposes the currently more fashionable view that it is always right for the individual to do that which produces the most good. Among the salient topics covered are: an account of the utilitarian function in society of generally accepted moral rules; a discussion of how we interpret existing moral rules and create new ones; and a defence of 'rule' utilitarianism against the charge that it either commits one to irrational rule worship, or collapses into a form of 'act' utilitarianism. This is a book about moral reasoning: how we actually reason and how we ought to reason. It defends a form of 'rule' utilitarianism whereby we must sometimes judge and act in moral questions in accordance with generally accepted rules, so long as the existence of those rules is justified by the good they bring about.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two Concepts of Rule Utilitarianism.Rex Martin - 2008 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (2):227-255.
Making room for rules.Adam Cureton - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (3):737-759.
Mill's theory of moral rules.Gerald F. Gaus - 1980 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (3):265 – 279.
Rules and Right in Mill.Piers Norris Turner - 2015 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (4):723-745.
The Incoherence Objection in Moral Theory.Eric Wiland - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (3):279-284.
Moral rules as expressive symbols.J. R. Cameron - 1981 - Mind 90 (358):224-242.
Rule utilitarianism and decision theory.JohnC Harsanyi - 1977 - Erkenntnis 11 (1):25 - 53.
A rule-utilitarian moral code.Michael D. Bayles - 1969 - Journal of Value Inquiry 3 (4):258-269.
Discussion.Brad Hooker - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):113-129.
Lon Fuller and the moral value of the rule of law.Colleen Murphy - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 24 (3):239-262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#324,761)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Conrad Dale Johnson
University of California, Santa Cruz

Citations of this work

Some Question-Begging Objections to Rule Consequentialism.Caleb Perl - 2023 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 101 (4):904-919.
Solving the Ideal Worlds Problem.Caleb Perl - 2021 - Ethics 132 (1):89-126.
Morality in the first person plural.Gerald J. Postema - 1995 - Law and Philosophy 14 (1):35 - 64.
Bentham on Presumed Offences.Frederick Schauer - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (4):363-379.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references