Forking and dividing in fields with several orderings and valuations

Journal of Mathematical Logic 22 (1):2150025 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider existentially closed fields with several orderings, valuations, and [Formula: see text]-valuations. We show that these structures are NTP2 of finite burden, but usually have the independence property. Moreover, forking agrees with dividing, and forking can be characterized in terms of forking in ACVF, RCF, and [Formula: see text]CF.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Forking and Dividing in Henson Graphs.Gabriel Conant - 2017 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 58 (4):555-566.
Forking and dividing in NTP₂ theories.Artem Chernikov & Itay Kaplan - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (1):1-20.
Elementary geometric local–global principles for fields.Arno Fehm - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (10):989-1008.
The model theory of m‐ordered differential fields.Cédric Rivière - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (4):331-339.
Stable Forking and Imaginaries.Enrique Casanovas & Joris Potier - 2018 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (4):497-502.
Residue Field Domination in Real Closed Valued Fields.Clifton Ealy, Deirdre Haskell & Jana Maříková - 2019 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 60 (3):333-351.
The stable forking conjecture and generic structures.Massoud Pourmahdian - 2003 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 42 (5):415-421.
A primer of simple theories.Rami Grossberg, José Iovino & Olivier Lessmann - 2002 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 41 (6):541-580.
Consistent amalgamation for þ-forking.Clifton Ealy & Alf Onshuus - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (2):503-519.
Henselian valued fields: a constructive point of view.Hervé Perdry - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (4):400-416.
Geometry of Forking in Simple Theories.Assaf Peretz - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (1):347 - 359.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-29

Downloads
9 (#1,224,450)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Will Johnson
Cardiff University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theories without the tree property of the second kind.Artem Chernikov - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (2):695-723.
Forking and dividing in NTP₂ theories.Artem Chernikov & Itay Kaplan - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (1):1-20.
Dp-Minimality: Basic Facts and Examples.Alfred Dolich, John Goodrick & David Lippel - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (3):267-288.
Definable V-topologies, Henselianity and NIP.Yatir Halevi, Assaf Hasson & Franziska Jahnke - 2019 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 20 (2):2050008.
An independence theorem for ntp2 theories.Itaï Ben Yaacov & Artem Chernikov - 2014 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 79 (1):135-153.

Add more references