Comprehension and computation in Bayesian problem solving
Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
On Bayesian problem-solving: helping Bayesians solve simple Bayesian word problems.Miroslav Sirota, Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau & Marie Juanchich - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Discussion: Re‐solving irrelevant conjunction with probabilistic independence.James Hawthorne & Branden Fitelson - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (4):505-514.
Exploration into Duhem 'Problem with Bayesian Approach'.Jian-Feng Zhang - 2007 - Modern Philosophy 5:131-136.
Thinking and computing: Computers as special kinds of signs. [REVIEW]James H. Fetzer - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (3):345-364.
Bayesian problem-solving and the dispensibility of truth.Paul Horwich - 1992 - Philosophical Issues 2:205-214.
What’s the Problem with Problem-Solving? Language, Skepticism, and Pragmatism.Naoko Saito & Paul Standish - 2009 - Contemporary Pragmatism 6 (1):153-167.
A Hierarchical Bayesian Model of Human Decision‐Making on an Optimal Stopping Problem.Michael D. Lee - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (3):1-26.
The frame problem, the relevance problem, and a package solution to both.Yingjin Xu & Pei Wang - 2012 - Synthese 187 (S1):43-72.
Reasoning and choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma : implications for improving Bayesian reasoning.Elisabet Tubau, David Aguilar-Lleyda & Eric D. Johnson - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussion.M. A. van Rees - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):465-479.
A Novel Solution to the Problem of Old Evidence.Jan Sprenger - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (3):383-401.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
17 (#642,119)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
2016-06-30
Downloads
17 (#642,119)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness.Patrick Weber, Karin Binder & Stefan Krauss - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Natural frequencies improve Bayesian reasoning in simple and complex inference tasks.Ulrich Hoffrage, Stefan Krauss, Laura Martignon & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Visual aids improve diagnostic inferences and metacognitive judgment calibration.Rocio Garcia-Retamero, Edward T. Cokely & Ulrich Hoffrage - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
How to Improve Performance in Bayesian Inference Tasks: A Comparison of Five Visualizations.Katharina Böcherer-Linder & Andreas Eichler - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
An Eye-Tracking Study of Statistical Reasoning With Tree Diagrams and 2 × 2 Tables.Georg Bruckmaier, Karin Binder, Stefan Krauss & Han-Min Kufner - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
References found in this work
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1974 - Science 185 (4157):1124-1131.
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Advancing the Debate.Jonathan Evans & Keith E. Stanovich - 2013 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):223-241.
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):293-315.
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.Daniel Kahneman - 2003 - American Psychologist 58 (9):697.
