Ancient Philosophy 35 (1):220-230 (2015)

Authors
Monte Johnson
University of California, San Diego
Abstract
According to a generally held impression, which has coalesced out of centuries of misinterpretation occasioned mostly by misguided charitable commentary, but often by outright hostility to his followers (and occasionally deliberate misrepresentation of his ideas), Aristotle is a teleological (as opposed to “mechanistic”) philosopher, responsible for a “qualitative” (as opposed to quantitative) approach to physics that is thereby inadequately mathematical, whose metaphysical speculations, as absorbing as they continue to be even for contemporary and otherwise ahistorical analytical metaphysicians, are essentially devoid of the virtues that determine the success of our modern sciences, which are in fact the result of overthrowing Aristotelian views. Jean De Groot’s monograph Aristotle’s Empiricism: experience and mechanics in the 4th century BC should completely wipe away that impression, as she offers an extremely attractive interpretation of Aristotle and his methods to replace it. This is a groundbreaking and exciting work, brimming with insights won from close and careful readings of both well-known and obscure passages of the Aristotle Corpus. It is an instant classic of Aristotle studies that should not only change the image of Aristotle’s role in the history of science but also set the agenda for much of the future research in every area of his theoretical sciences, including metaphysics, mathematics, and natural science. Thus although my primary goal in this review is to summarize its contents and try to give an idea of the richness, depth, and breadth of de Groot’s project, I will mention at the end what I think are the most important ways that the research should be developed and extended—the next areas of Aristotle studies that should incorporate these views and methods.
Keywords Ancient Philosophy  Classical Studies  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0740-2007
DOI 10.5840/ancientphil201535115
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dunamis and the Science of Mechanics: Aristotle on Animal Motion.Jean De Groot - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):43-67.
The Status and Significance of Aristotle’s Definition of Nature.Jean De Groot - 1999 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 73:99-107.
An Empirical Critique of Empiricism.Richard De Brasi & Joseph R. Laracy - 2013 - Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 16 (4):124-163.
Aristotle on Teleology.Tiberiu Popa - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2):323-324.
Authenticating Aristotle's Protrepticus.Monte Ransome Johnson & D. S. Hutchinson - 2005 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29:193-294.
Aristotle on Teleology.Monte Ransome Johnson - 2008 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
On “Those Truths of Experience Upon Which Philosophy Is Founded”.Karen Hanson - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28 (Supplement):55-70.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-04

Total views
138 ( #83,613 of 2,499,227 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #50,828 of 2,499,227 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes