History and Philosophy of Logic 11 (1):59-65 (1990)
AbstractUnrestricted use of the axiom schema of comprehension, ?to every mathematically (or set-theoretically) describable property there corresponds the set of all mathematical (or set-theoretical) objects having that property?, leads to contradiction. In set theories of the Zermelo?Fraenkel?Skolem (ZFS) style suitable instances of the comprehension schema are chosen ad hoc as axioms, e.g.axioms which guarantee the existence of unions, intersections, pairs, subsets, empty set, power sets and replacement sets. It is demonstrated that a uniform syntactic description may be given of acceptable instances of the comprehension schema, which include all of the axioms mentioned, and which in their turn are theorems of the usual versions of ZFS set theory. Well then, shall we proceed as usual and begin by assuming the existence of a single essential nature or Form for every set of things which we call by the same name? Do you understand? (Plato, Republic X.596a6; cf. Cornford 1966, 317)
Similar books and articles
On Interpretations of Bounded Arithmetic and Bounded Set Theory.Richard Pettigrew - 2009 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (2):141-152.
A Linear Conservative Extension of Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory.Masaru Shirahata - 1996 - Studia Logica 56 (3):361 - 392.
The Origins of Zermelo's Axiomatization of Set Theory.Gregory H. Moore - 1978 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):307 - 329.
The Model of Set Theory Generated by Countably Many Generic Reals.Andreas Blass - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (4):732-752.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Foundations of Set Theory.Abraham Adolf Fraenkel & Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1958 - Atlantic Highlands, NJ, USA: North-Holland.
Cantorian Set Theory and Limitation of Size.Joseph W. Dauben - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (4):541-550.