Expectations for methodology and translation of animal research: a survey of health care workers

BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):29 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Health care workers often perform, promote, and advocate use of public funds for animal research ; therefore, an awareness of the empirical costs and benefits of animal research is an important issue for HCW. We aim to determine what health-care-workers consider should be acceptable standards of AR methodology and translation rate to humans

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Standards for animal research: Looking at the middle.Rebecca Dresser - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):123-143.
Animal rights v animal research: a modest proposal.J. Bernstein - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (5):300-303.
Animal care ethics, ANZCCART, and public perceptions of animal use ethics.Fred Gifford - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):249-257.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-07

Downloads
57 (#264,838)

6 months
9 (#210,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations