Commentary

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):376-377 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Professionals in transplantation medicine have a particularly difficult task that most other healthcare professionals in the United States do not have to face explicitly. That is, the transplanters control the use of scarce solid organs. Because they invariably have more than one patient who might benefit from a new kidney (or liver, heart, etc.), they cannot focus single-mindedly on their duty to each and every patient as if no other patient mattered. In the case at hand, the patient has had more than one of a life-sustaining organ. At some centers, one, perhaps two, previous organs would count as After that, the patient has had her chances and it is time to move on to others. Moreover, some believe the patient in this case has contributed to the current problem by inadequate care of the gifts she has been given

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bijuralism: an economic approach.Albert Breton & M. J. Trebilcock (eds.) - 2006 - Burlington, VT: Ashgate Pub. Company.
Philosophical commentary.Gerhard Seel - 2001 - In Gerhard Seel, Jean-Pierre Schneider, Daniel Schulthess, Mario Mignucci & Ammonius (eds.), Ammonius and the Seabattle: Texts, Commentary and Essays. De Gruyter.
Richard Rufus’s De anima Commentary.Rega Wood - 2001 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 10 (1):119-156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
2 (#1,722,101)

6 months
2 (#1,015,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references