The Dretske–Tooley–Armstrong theory of natural laws and the inference problem

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):227-243 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I intend to show that the inference problem, one of the main objections raised against the anti-Humean theory of natural laws defended by Dretske, Tooley and Armstrong (?DTA theory? for short), can be successfully answered. First, I argue that a proper solution should meet two essential requirements that the proposals made by the DTA theorists do not satisfy. Then I state a solution to the inference problem that assumes a local immanentistic view of universals, a partial definition of the nomic necessitation relation as a relation of existential dependence, and a principle constraining multiple occupancy. I also argue that my solution meets the two requirements. Finally, I deal with non-standard laws such as exclusion laws, causal laws and laws involving spatiotemporal parameters

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Metaphysical Necessity of Natural Laws.Quentin Smith - 1996 - Proceedings of the Heraclitean Society 18:104-23.
Natural necessity and laws of nature.Herbert Hochberg - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):386-399.
Tooley's solution to the inference problem.Theodore R. Sider - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 67 (3):261 - 275.
The dispositional essentialist view of properties and laws.Anjan Chakravartty - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (4):393 – 413.
Explicating lawhood.Peter Vallentyne - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):598-613.
The Dretske-Tooley-Armstrong theory of natural laws and the inference problem.Joan Pag - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):227 – 243.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
55 (#284,290)

6 months
14 (#168,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No laws and (thin) powers in, no (governing) laws out.Stavros Ioannidis, Vassilis Livanios & Stathis Psillos - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-26.
It is the Business of Laws to Govern.Jonathan Schaffer - 2016 - Dialectica 70 (4):577-588.
Essence and the inference problem.Ashley Coates - 2021 - Synthese 198 (2):915-931.
Categorical Monism, Laws, and the Inference Problem.Vassilis Livanios - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (4):599-619.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
What is a Law of Nature?D. M. Armstrong - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Sydney Shoemaker.
A World of States of Affairs.D. Armstrong - 1993 - Philosophical Perspectives 7:429-440.
Universals and scientific realism.David Malet Armstrong - 1978 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references