Situated Creativity: A Way out of the Impasse of the Heidegger-Cassirer Debate

History of European Ideas 41 (4):565-570 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

SummaryThis paper criticizes the dualism of “thrownness” and “spontaneity” in Peter Gordon's interpretation of the Heidegger-Cassirer debate and shows that American pragmatism and other currents of thought offer an alternative in the form of a conception of situated creativity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Semántica y metodología: descansen impasse.Federico Penelas - 1998 - Análisis Filosófico 18 (2):159-163.
On The Debate Between Cassirer And Heidegger In Davos. [REVIEW]Anna Musioł - 2013 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 8 (2):171-175.
Revisiting the Heidegger–Cassirer Debate.Frank Schalow - 2012 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 4 (2):307 - 315.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-01

Downloads
21 (#630,965)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reflections on Continental Divide: An Author's Response.Peter E. Gordon - 2015 - History of European Ideas 41 (4):454-469.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy.John Dewey - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 109-140.
The need for recovery of philosophy.John Dewey - 2020 - In John Dewey, Harold Chapman Brown, George Herbert Mead, Horace Meyer Kallen & Addison Webster Moore (eds.), Creative intelligence: essays in the pragmatic attitude. Nova Science Publishers.

Add more references