Futility, Conscientious Refusal, and Who Gets to Decide

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (4):356-373 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most discussions of medical futility try to answer the Futility Question: when is a medical procedure futile? No answer enjoys universal support. Some futility policies say that the health care provider will answer this question when the provider and patient cannot agree. This raises the Decision Question: who has the moral authority to decide what to do in cases where futility is disputed? I look for a procedural answer to this question, an answer that does not turn on whether a given party happens to answer the Futility Question correctly. I argue that these policies get it right; the provider should decide because providers have a right of conscientious refusal that extends to refusing procedures on grounds of futility. This is a procedural answer because providers have this right even if they are sincerely mistaken about whether a procedure is futile

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
29 (#518,760)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Licensing Surrogate Decision-Makers.Philip M. Rosoff - 2017 - HEC Forum 29 (2):145-169.
Introduction.H. A. Phillips - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (4):295-301.
Medicine, Morality, and Mortality: The Challenges of Moral Diversity.Mark J. Cherry - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (5):473-483.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Taking rights seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - London: Duckworth.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Ethics 90 (1):121-130.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Mind 88 (350):305-309.
Taking Rights Seriously.Alan R. White - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (109):379-380.

View all 11 references / Add more references