The Double Ergon Scheme in Aristotle’s Protrepticus

Eirene: Studia Graeca Et Latina 59 (1-2):29-65 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The article presents the first comprehensive interpretation of the ergon argument in Aristotle’s Protrepticus. It further argues that Aristotle in this argument distinguishes the ergon of an entity from the ergon of its virtue thus presenting a complicated argumentative structure which is explicitly simplified in the Eudemian Ethics. Based on the latest attempts to reconstruct the Protrepticus, the article shows the relation of the ergon argument to its other versions in both Ethics. This account not only clarifies the relation of the Protrepticus to Aristotle’s other ethical writings, it shows that Aristotle intends the argument as a transition between describing what human being does and what a good human being does well, namely a natural transition from the descriptive to the normative.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

78 (#218,315)

6 months
78 (#66,251)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jakub Jirsa
Charles University, Prague

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations