Rawlsian and Confucian Distributive Justice and the Worst Off

Philosophia 50 (4):1895-1912 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In any complex human society, distinct persons may have strikingly different standards of living. Those who lead the most undesirable, poorest lives in society can be called the worst off. Given that we almost always do not want to be, but some have to be, the worst off, we may want to find a right way to treat the worst off. In the West, John Rawls has proposed a conception of justice as fairness, and in the East, Confucius and Mencius have developed conceptions of ren and yi partly in order to deal with social injustice in the distribution of benefits and the problem of the worst off. Their conceptions and proposed solutions provide valuable ideas, which through comparison may be better assessed and then employed, or even combined, to address the problem. In this essay, I try to examine and compare their conceptions of distributive justice and the worst off, and then expound their suggested solutions to the problem and propose a provisional answer on the basis of those ideas.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rescuing Justice and Equality.G. A. Cohen (ed.) - 2008 - Harvard University Press.
Property, Community, and the Problem of Distributive Justice.J. E. Penner - 2009 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 10 (1):193-216.
Confucianism and acceptable inequalities.Sungmoon Kim - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (10):0191453713507015.
Equality versus Priority.Michael Otsuka & Alex Voorhoeve - 2018 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 65-85.
A Humean Theory of Distributive Justice for a New Century.Sheldon Wein - unknown - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 41:266-272.
Corrective vs. Distributive Justice: the Case of Apologies.Andrew I. Cohen - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (3):663-677.
The Relation of Envy to Distributive Justice.Harrison P. Frye - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (3):501-524.
How Association Matters for Distributive Justice.Helena de Bres - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (2):161-186.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-22

Downloads
28 (#490,139)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Justice as fairness: a restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Fairness to goodness.John Rawls - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (4):536-554.
Rawls on justice.Thomas Nagel - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (2):220-234.
What Makes a Political Theory Utopian.Thomas Nagel - 1989 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 56.

Add more references