A computational approach for creativity assessment of culinary products: the case of elBulli

AI and Society 37 (1):331-353 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent years, the gastronomy industry has increased the demand for rigorous and reliable tools to evaluate culinary creativity; but conceptually, creativity is difficult to define and even more difficult to measure. In this paper, we propose an AI-based method for assessing culinary product creativity by using the renowned high cuisine restaurant elBulli as a case study to understand the proliferation and scale of an entity’s creativity and innovation. To achieve so, we trained a Random Forest Classifier to assess the level of creativity within the restaurant’s recipes. The application of this model to elBulli’s recipes allowed us to answer the following questions: how can creativity in a culinary product be characterized? Is there a single trait that is the key to culinary creativity? Is the creative culinary product a truly original outcome? Our key findings are (1) although ingredients and preparation techniques prove to be suitable attributes to characterize creativity in a recipe, none of them nor an elite subset clearly identifies creative cuisine, (2) new products are not radically novel with respect to previous creations, (3) creativity is more related to new uses and combinations of existing ingredients and techniques rather than to new ingredients or techniques. We believe that our method can find practical applications in supporting and guiding the creation of culinary products, identifying their strengths and weaknesses, and helping restaurants maintain a sustainable competitive advantage.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modelling Culinary Value.Patrik Engisch - 2022 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (2):1-12.
Attributing Creativity.Elliot Samuel Paul & Dustin Stokes - 2018 - In Berys Nigel Gaut & Matthew Kieran (eds.), Creativity and Philosophy. New York: Routledge.
Creative product and creative process in science and art.L. Briskman - 1981 - In Denis Dutton & Michael Krausz (eds.), The Concept of creativity in science and art. Hingham, MA: Distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer Boston. pp. 83 – 106.
Measuring creativity: an account of natural and artificial creativity.Caterina Moruzzi - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-20.
Creative product and creative process in science and art.Larry Briskman - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):83 – 106.
Explaining Creativity.Maria Kronfeldner - 2018 - In Berys Gaut & Matthew Kieran (eds.), Routledge Handbook on Creativity and Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 213-29.
What, If Anything, Is Linguistic Creativity?Alexander Bergs - 2019 - Gestalt Theory 41 (2):173-183.
Can Unmodified Food be Culinary Art?Sara Bernstein - 2020 - Argumenta 2 (5):185-198.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-10

Downloads
16 (#883,649)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Creative product and creative process in science and art.Larry Briskman - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):83 – 106.
Before the Gates of Excellence: The Determinants of Creative Genius.R. Ochse - 1991 - British Journal of Educational Studies 39 (1):85-86.
From judgment to calculation.Mike Cooley - 2007 - AI and Society 21 (4):395-409.
Creative product and creative process in science and art.L. Briskman - 1981 - In Denis Dutton & Michael Krausz (eds.), The Concept of creativity in science and art. Hingham, MA: Distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer Boston. pp. 83 – 106.

View all 8 references / Add more references