Abstract

New developments in molecular and cell biology during the past three decades have demonstrated that cells use a language of their own, namely"cell language". The essential features of the so-called cell language theory formulated in 1997 are reviewed as a prelude to establishing the concept ofmicrosemiotics'' and "microsemiosis''' the semiotics and sign processes, respectively, on the molecular level. Peircean semiotics is largely concemedwith macroscopic signs and hence is here referred to as macrosemiotics. The possibihty of extending Peircean semiotics from macroscale to microscale was clearly foreseen by Sebeok in 1968 who also intuited the evolutionary, link between macro- and microsemiosis, leading to the formulation of what is here called the "Sebeok doctrine of signs" that contains 5 major testable propositions. The concept of "cosmosemiosis" as the sum of three terms, physiosemiosis, macrosemiosis, and microsemiosis, is defined and related to a theoretical model of the Universe known as the Shillongator, published in 1991, according to which superstrings serve as the primal source of free energy and information and hence as the Universal Sign Processor, similar to DNA acting as the primary biological sign processor in the living cell. Thus, the Shillongator as the physical effector or effectuator of cosmosemiosis appears to provide a coherent theoretical framework to integrate i) the Sebeok doctrine of signs, ii) Deely's theory of physiosemiotics, iii) macro- or Pericean semiotics, iv) the present author's microsemiotics, and v) Merleau-Ponty's ontology ofthe Flesh