Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom
New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press (2021)
Abstract
This book rewrites the story of classical Chinese philosophy, which has always been considered the single most creative and vibrant chapter in the history of Chinese philosophy. Works attributed to Confucius, Mozi, Mencius, Laozi, Zhuangzi, Xunzi, Han Feizi and many others represent the very origins of moral and political thinking in China. As testimony to their enduring stature, in recent decades many Chinese intellectuals, and even leading politicians, have turned to those classics, especially Confucian texts, for alternative or complementary sources of moral authority and political legitimacy. Therefore, philosophical inquiries into core normative values embedded in those classical texts are crucial to the ongoing scholarly discussion about China as China turns more culturally inward. It can also contribute to the spirited contemporary debate about the nature of philosophical reasoning, especially in the non-Western traditions. This book offers a new narrative and interpretative framework about the origins of moral-political philosophy that tracks how the three normative values, humaneness, justice, and personal freedom, were formulated, reformulated, and contested by early Chinese philosophers in their effort to negotiate the relationship among three distinct domains, the personal, the familial, and the political. Such efforts took place as those thinkers were reimagining a new moral-political order, debating its guiding norms, and exploring possible sources within the context of an evolving understanding of Heaven and its relationship with the humans. Tao Jiang argues that the competing visions in that debate can be characterized as a contestation between partialist humaneness and impartialist justice as the guiding norm for the newly imagined moral-political order, with the Confucians, the Mohists, the Laoists, and the so-called fajia thinkers being the major participants, constituting the mainstream philosophical project during this period. Thinkers lined up differently along the justice-humaneness spectrum with earlier ones maintaining some continuity between the two normative values (or at least trying to accommodate both to some extent) while later ones leaning more toward their exclusivity in the political/public domain. Zhuangzi and the Zhuangists were the outliers of the mainstream moral-political debate who rejected the very parameter of humaneness versus justice in that discourse. They were a lone voice advocating personal freedom, but the Zhuangist expressions of freedom were self-restricted to the margins of the political world and the interiority of one's heartmind. Such a take can shed new light on how the Zhuangist approach to personal freedom would profoundly impact the development of this idea in pre-modern Chinese political and intellectual history.Author's Profile
ISBN(s)
0197611362 0197603475 9780197611364 9780197603475 9780197603505
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Early Chinese Ethics and Political Philosophy.Alexus McLeod (ed.) - 2018 - New York: Bloomsbury.
Free Will and Zhuangzi: An Introduction.Christian Wenzel - 2021 - In John Perry, Michael Bratman & John Martin Fischer (eds.), Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Ninth Edition. Oxford University Press. pp. 460-473.
Achievements, predicaments and trend of Moral Confucianism.Song Zhiming - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):503-516.
China: The Political Philosophy of the Middle Kingdom by Bai Tongdong (review).David Elstein - 2014 - Philosophy East and West 64 (2):513-515.
Political Thought in Early Confucianism.Liang Tao - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (2):212-236.
The Philosophy of the Mòzĭ: The First Consequentialists.Chris Fraser - 2016 - New York: Columbia University Press.
The origin of political liberty in confucianism: A nietzschean intrepretation.Sungmoon Kim - 2008 - History of Political Thought 29 (3):393-415.
Comments on Durante’s account of multiculturalism.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (2):84-85.
Zhuangzi’s Ironic Detachment and Political Commitment.Bryan W. Van Norden - 2016 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15 (1):1-17.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-10-26
Downloads
12 (#805,853)
6 months
4 (#184,255)
2021-10-26
Downloads
12 (#805,853)
6 months
4 (#184,255)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Difference Between Ren and Yi: Mengzi’s Anti-Guodianism at 6A4-5.Waldemar Brys - forthcoming - Sophia:1-16.
Genealogy as Meditation and Adaptation with the Han Feizi.Lee Wilson - 2022 - The Monist 105 (4):452-469.