Abstract

"Book of Changes" for the Chinese culture's very old, and with a mysterious literature classics, Confucius late hi "easy", Wei compiled Ruin. When the Western Han Dynasty set up a "Five Classics" Doctor, "easy" is also set silt which, signifying its importance can not be shaken. Many Chinese thinkers, "Book" of the original Code's "understanding" and "interpretation" are not the same, for example: Zheng Xuan Note "Book of Changes" is "to take as" Wang Bi Note "Book of Changes" is "justice"; Wang Bi is "Taoist "ideological interpretation of the" Book of Changes ", Cheng Yi, Zhu Xi is based on" Confucian "ideology; Wang Bi, Cheng Yi, Zhu Xi is the" Henry J's perspective of the "Book of Changes", Zhang's talk about "Book of Changes" is a "common sense" thinking about history as interpretation of the approach roads. The reason why opinions are, because the thinkers of the "Book of Changes," the original code there own "pre-understanding" and therefore have very different "ontological interpretation" and "create interpretation", this will invoke Gadamer, "Hermeneutics" concept , discussed China's "Book of Changes" of the original Code, after a number of thinkers in the post-interpretation "Zhiyong of change" period to Combing through the "Book of Changes" thinking "model flow" of the historical trajectory. Zhou Yi its age is extremely remote for the Chinese culture, this literature ancient book also has the mystical color, Confucius's old age like to read Yi, the number of times is frequent. Martial emperor of Han dynasty sets up Five Classics doctor, Yi is the one of them, indicates its unshakeable importance. The Chinese multitudinous thinkers regarding Zhou Yi, the source-book "understood" and "the annotation" are different, for example: Zheng Hsuan explains the image from annotate Zhou Yi, Wang Pi explains the significance from annotate Zhou Yi; Wang Pi explains Zhou Yi by "Taoism" thought, Cheng I and Zhu Xi explains Zhou Yi by "Confucian" thought; Wang Pi, Cheng I, Zhu Xi explains Zhou Yi by "the righteousness principle", Zhan , Xue-Cheng discuss Zhou Yi by the historical thought which equates "the thought of affair". The reason of people have wide divided opinions is the thinkers have their "Vorsicht" from the source-book of Zhou Yi, so there are very different in "the Ontological Interpretations" and "the Creative Interpretations", this article quotes the hermeneutic idea from Gadamer, and elaborate the source-book of Chinese Zhou Yi which change of the effectiveness after many thinker's annotation, then hope to reorganize the thought of Zhou Yi and that model pasts in historical path