Synthese 199 (1-2):4483-4497 (2020)

Theories of structured meanings are designed to generate fine-grained meanings, but they are also liable to overgenerate structures, thus drawing structural distinctions without a semantic difference. I recommend the proliferation of very fine-grained structures, so that we are able to draw any semantic distinctions we think we might need. But, in order to contain overgeneration, I argue we should insert some degree of individuation between logical equivalence and structural identity based on structural isomorphism. The idea amounts to forming an equivalence class of different structures according to one or more formal criteria and designating a privileged element as a representative of all the elements, i.e., a first among equals. The proposed method helps us to a cluster of notions of co-hyperintensionality. As a test case, I consider a recent objection levelled against the act theory of structured propositions. I also respond to an objection against my methodology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-020-02987-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Propositional Content.Peter Hanks - 2015 - Oxford University Press.
Quality and Concept.George Bealer - 1983 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (3):347-348.
Propositions as Cognitive Acts.Scott Soames - 2019 - Synthese 196 (4):1369-1383.
Quality and Concept.George Bealer - 1984 - Mind 93 (371):455-458.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Act‐Type Theories of Propositions.Thomas Hodgson - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (11).
Substitution Inconsistencies in Transparent Intensional Logic.Miloš Kosterec - 2021 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 31 (3-4):355-371.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Structured Propositions and Sentence Structure.Jeffrey King - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (5):495 - 521.
Hyperintensional Propositions.Mark Jago - 2015 - Synthese 192 (3):585-601.
Introduction.Marie Duží & Bjørn Jespersen - 2015 - Synthese 192 (3):525-534.
Reality is Not Structured.Jeremy Goodman - 2017 - Analysis 77 (1):43–53.
Structured Characters and Complex Demonstratives.David Braun - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 74 (2):193--219.
The Redundancy of the Act.John Collins - 2018 - Synthese 195 (8):3519-3545.
Compositionality and Structured Propositions.Lorraine Juliano Keller & John A. Keller - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):313-323.


Added to PP index

Total views
24 ( #470,883 of 2,498,992 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #118,239 of 2,498,992 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes