Issues in neo- and paleoneurology of language

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):195-196 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wilkins and Wakefield's hypothesis that language is fundamentally a cognitive rather than cominunicational adaptation is reasonable, but there are flaws in their anatomical and fossil evidence. Their analysis of reorganization also needs clarification. Finally, the origin of language ability must have occurred with australopithecine rather than habiline adaptations on entry into the novel hominid adaptive zone

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brains evolution and neurolinguistic preconditions.Wendy K. Wilkins & Jennie Wakefield - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):161-182.
Issues and nonissues in the origins of language.Wendy K. Wilkins & Jennie Wakefield - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):205-226.
Language as a multimodal sensory enhancement system.Bob Jacobs & John M. Horner - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):194-195.
Knowledge, language and learning.Rama Kant Agnihotri & Hriday Kant Dewan (eds.) - 2010 - Delhi: Macmillan Publishers India.
Is preadaptation for language a necessary assumption?David J. Bryant - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):183-184.
The hominid tool-language connection: Some missing evolutionary links?A. Maryanski - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):199-200.
Human language: Are nonhuman precursors lacking?Marc D. Hauser & Nathan D. Wolfea - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):190-191.
Tegn som Språk.Sissel Redse Jørgensen & Rani Lill Anjum (eds.) - 2006 - Gyldendal Akademisk.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
25 (#614,662)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations