Conflict over Conflicts of Interest: An Analysis of the New NIH Rules

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (1):105-110 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Concern over research integrity at the NIH led to the adoption of strict conflict of interest rules in 2005. An outcry from NIH scientists followed. This paper analyzes the legal and ethical issues raised by the new rules, and suggests potential areas for modification

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conflicts of interest.Thomas L. Carson - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (5):387 - 404.
Conflicts of interest in science.David B. Resnik - 1998 - Perspectives on Science 6 (4):381-408.
The troublesome semantics of conflict of interest.Paul J. Friedman - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):245 – 251.
The impact of conflict of interest on trust in science.Paul J. Friedman - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):413-420.
Covering antigone: Reporting on conflict of interest.Lee Wilkins - 1995 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (1):23 – 36.
Conflict of interest in croatia: Doctors with dual obligations.Bozidar Vrhovac - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):309-316.
Addressing Within-Role Conflicts of Interest in Surgery.Wendy A. Rogers & Jane Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):219-225.
Conflict of interest: The importance of potential.Imogen Evans - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):393-396.
Conflicts of interest at the NIH: No easy solution.David M. Resnick - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (1):18-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
11 (#1,022,695)

6 months
2 (#889,309)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?